Hope to see everyone at Space Access over the next few days in Phoenix!
http://space-access.org/updates/sa16info.html
Thursday, April 7, 2016
Saturday, March 19, 2016
New Digs, New Gig
I'm now at Ursa Major Technologies!
Check us out at:
http://www.ursamajortechnologies.com/
and Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ursamajortechnologies/
Check us out at:
http://www.ursamajortechnologies.com/
and Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ursamajortechnologies/
Saturday, May 2, 2015
Printing 5000 Pounds
You can check out additional photos here:
https://manufacturing.llnl.gov/additive-manufacturing/metal-additive-manufacturing
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
PR56 Igniter Open Source
Just a note that a few months back I posted "the source" for the PR56 igniter that I've tested with GOX/kerosene.
There is a dimensioned drawing of the igniter body as well as a detailed write-up that includes parts lists and operational notes. If you make one or use it as inspiration, I'd love to hear about it via email or comment.
I'm planning on revitalizing the blog over the next few weeks, so stay tuned.
There is a dimensioned drawing of the igniter body as well as a detailed write-up that includes parts lists and operational notes. If you make one or use it as inspiration, I'd love to hear about it via email or comment.
I'm planning on revitalizing the blog over the next few weeks, so stay tuned.
Monday, June 23, 2014
A bigger valve
Here is a larger version of an actuated valve assembly. The first version is based around a 1/4" Swagelok valve (SS-4P4T). This version mates a 3/8" SwageLok 1/4 turn plug valve (SS-6P6T or B-6P6T) to a Hitec Standard size servo.
There are two printed parts:
Shaft Coupler - http://shpws.me/r4U6
Yoke - http://shpws.me/r4kM
These are the fasteners needed:
qty 4 8-32 x 1/2"" Socket Head Cap Screw, McMaster-Carr 92196A194
qty 4 #8 Flat Washer, McMaster-Carr 96659A103
qty 2 4-40 x 1.75" Socket Head Cap Screw, McMaster-Carr 92185A128
qty 2 #4 Flat Washer, McMaster-Carr 96659A101
There are two printed parts:
Shaft Coupler - http://shpws.me/r4U6
Yoke - http://shpws.me/r4kM
These are the fasteners needed:
qty 4 8-32 x 1/2"" Socket Head Cap Screw, McMaster-Carr 92196A194
qty 4 #8 Flat Washer, McMaster-Carr 96659A103
qty 2 4-40 x 1.75" Socket Head Cap Screw, McMaster-Carr 92185A128
qty 2 #4 Flat Washer, McMaster-Carr 96659A101
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Testing the New Chambers
Just a quick note that testing is proceeding with the new Printed (3D printing, DMLS, additive manufatured) chambers. The cobalt alloy turns an interesting green color when it gets warm.
Monday, September 30, 2013
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Blue Flame
Its been quite a while since my last post. Things have been busy and I'm working several nifty projects. I wanted to share a picture of a new igniter that I've made for a new project. It's designed to run on GOX/Kerosene and works well so far.
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Printed Widgets
I'm finding that 3D Printed parts are pretty handing for custom brackets and widgets. I'm currently working on a new chamber project and needed a mounting bracket for it. The part took me about 30 minutes to design and costs ~$15.
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
DMLS Chamber Version 2
Here are the specs for the redesigned version of the DMLS chamber. This project pending interest and resources. Drop me a line if you would be interested in supporting a project like this.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
More Valves
I've been doing quite a bit of parts with Shapeways lately both flow models and functional parts. One of the latest is a rework of my servo actuated plug valve.
Two parts allow a Swage-Lok SS-4P4T valve to be actuated by a Hitec servo - I recommend a high torque metal gear model like the HS-7954SH. The only other hardware required are (you'll need taps to clean up the threads in the nylon):
qty 4 8-32 x 5/16" Socket Head Cap Screws, McMaster-Carr 92196A191
qty 2 4-40 x 1.25" Socket Head Cap Screws, McMaster-Carr 92196A302
The printed parts are available on Shapeways
Shaft: http://www.shapeways.com/model/903741/shaft-coupler-hitec.html?li=productBox-search
Bracket: http://www.shapeways.com/model/903740/bonnet-ss-4p4t.html?li=productBox-search
Two parts allow a Swage-Lok SS-4P4T valve to be actuated by a Hitec servo - I recommend a high torque metal gear model like the HS-7954SH. The only other hardware required are (you'll need taps to clean up the threads in the nylon):
qty 4 8-32 x 5/16" Socket Head Cap Screws, McMaster-Carr 92196A191
qty 2 4-40 x 1.25" Socket Head Cap Screws, McMaster-Carr 92196A302
The printed parts are available on Shapeways
Shaft: http://www.shapeways.com/model/903741/shaft-coupler-hitec.html?li=productBox-search
Bracket: http://www.shapeways.com/model/903740/bonnet-ss-4p4t.html?li=productBox-search
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
The "Open" Part
As I said in the previous post, I've been working on things that run on magic smoke. The board has reached a certain level of maturity where I'm willing to share. By that I mean I've tested it and it all works - Its not all that pretty and there are some things I'm working on improving. But the design is at a point where I feel someone else could pick it up and have a reasonable chance of reproducing it.
So, I've uploaded all the relevant information, schematics, layout, gerber files, PDFs to a project page on the www.rocketmoonlighting.com site.
Check It Out
So, I've uploaded all the relevant information, schematics, layout, gerber files, PDFs to a project page on the www.rocketmoonlighting.com site.
Check It Out
- Parallax Propeller P8X32A - 8 cores, 80Mhz each
- 8 12 bit, single ended Analog input channels, max 44k total samples per second
- 3 high current, low side MOSFET drivers (approximately 20A each)
- 12 servo channels, independently configurable as inputs or outputs
- Direct drive of AC Delco D514 ignition coil
- Onboard MPU-6050 Six-Axis Motion Sensor
- Designed to run on 2 cell Lithium Polymer battery
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Electrons
I've been working on some engine controller modules lately - not much rocket plumbing related things going on.
Below is a picture of some of the boards I've had made. I'm expecting rev 3 to be delivered early next week. This is my first "serious" circuit board design effort and I've found it to be more challenging than I thought initially. The 2.5 x 3.0" board replaces a stack of 2 2.5x3.5" boards in addition to adding some functionality.
I'm planning on making the design available when its finished.
Sunday, May 27, 2012
Valves By Request
I had a request for additional details on some of the valves I use. I polished up my drawing and loaded it on the website, www.rocketmoonlighting.com/valves. It includes a little bit of useful details about o-ring material as well as McMaster-Carr part numbers.
Open Source Hardware is all the rage these days. I'm not sure that OSH will be quite the revolution that OSS was - replicating hardware from a "source" has a higher barrier to entry than replicating executable software from source. It also takes more time and effort to develop new hardware - I wonder about the sustainability of OSH because in the end, people have to be compensated for their time somehow.
In any case, part of the point of this post is that I do requests! So if people have things they want to see, drop me a line or post a comment.
Open Source Hardware is all the rage these days. I'm not sure that OSH will be quite the revolution that OSS was - replicating hardware from a "source" has a higher barrier to entry than replicating executable software from source. It also takes more time and effort to develop new hardware - I wonder about the sustainability of OSH because in the end, people have to be compensated for their time somehow.
In any case, part of the point of this post is that I do requests! So if people have things they want to see, drop me a line or post a comment.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Plastic Rockets
Sort of. I ordered two of my latest chamber designs in plastic from shapeways.com. The cost is very inexpensive and even though i can really fire them, they do help to visualize the design. Its also useful for fitting up the chamber to other components like the test stand.
The picture above is the 50 lbf scaled up design that I did on request. The material is Shapeways' Frosted Ultra Detail and it came out very well. The regen passages are very crisp and well defined. The only drawback is that they are still full of powder. I actually mailed this part over to the individual who asked about the feasibility of scaling up the thrust.
As you can see in the picture below, the 50 lbf version is comparable in size to my original chamber, which is only 12 lbf. The original chamber was fairly conservative in size, and so the results of testing and additional analysis indicate that the chamber volume can be quite a bit smaller for a given thrust level. The other plastic model is version two of the 12lbf motor - notice the size difference. This part was printed in Shapeways' Transparent Detail material and the results were not quite as good. I'll be using Frosted Ultra Detail in the future.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
3D Printed Rockets: The Cost Curve
If you've been around the rocket community, you may have heard of the "square cube law". Basically, there are some physical parameters of machines that vary as a function of the square of length dimensions. Thrust in a rocket engine for instance, is a function of the throat area, which is in turn a function of the throat diameter squared. Volume and therefore mass is a function of the cube of a length parameter. As a result, when scaling up the thrust of a rocket engine, the mass only increases with the square root of the ratio of the thrust.
So what? In manufacturing, part of the cost of making a part is the amortization of the capital cost of the machine used to make a part. In conventional machining techniques, labor and other costs also play heavily. However, in additive techniques like DMLS, the cost to make a part is largely driven by the cost of the DMLS machine: as a result, the cost of a part is generally proportional to the volume of metal in the part.

Consider the three chamber designs above. The chambers progress up in thrust by a factor of 10 from right to left. So the first chamber is 10 lbf thrust, the second 100 lbf, and the third 1000 lbf. Because of "the square cube law" the chamber on the right only has about 10 times as much metal material as the chamber on the far left - despite having 100 times the thrust. Do to the wonder additive manufacturing, we could estimate that if the 10 lbf chamber cost $1, then the cost of the 1000 lbf chamber would only be about $10. In real numbers, that means a 1000 lb chamber could probably be printed using DMLS for less than $10,000 - a pretty significant price point compared to other manufacturing techniques.
I recently got an email from someone asking about the feasibility of a 50lbf version of my DMLS chamber. I spent a few hours and drew the above model. Interestingly, this model has nearly the same metal material as Version1 of my DMLS chamber - which means that despite being rated for 5x the thrust, it could be made for roughly 1.5x the cost. The primary mass reduction comes from the learning curve of the first DMLS chamber and being able to downsize based on the test results from V1.
So what? In manufacturing, part of the cost of making a part is the amortization of the capital cost of the machine used to make a part. In conventional machining techniques, labor and other costs also play heavily. However, in additive techniques like DMLS, the cost to make a part is largely driven by the cost of the DMLS machine: as a result, the cost of a part is generally proportional to the volume of metal in the part.

Consider the three chamber designs above. The chambers progress up in thrust by a factor of 10 from right to left. So the first chamber is 10 lbf thrust, the second 100 lbf, and the third 1000 lbf. Because of "the square cube law" the chamber on the right only has about 10 times as much metal material as the chamber on the far left - despite having 100 times the thrust. Do to the wonder additive manufacturing, we could estimate that if the 10 lbf chamber cost $1, then the cost of the 1000 lbf chamber would only be about $10. In real numbers, that means a 1000 lb chamber could probably be printed using DMLS for less than $10,000 - a pretty significant price point compared to other manufacturing techniques.
I recently got an email from someone asking about the feasibility of a 50lbf version of my DMLS chamber. I spent a few hours and drew the above model. Interestingly, this model has nearly the same metal material as Version1 of my DMLS chamber - which means that despite being rated for 5x the thrust, it could be made for roughly 1.5x the cost. The primary mass reduction comes from the learning curve of the first DMLS chamber and being able to downsize based on the test results from V1.
Sunday, March 18, 2012
More Testing
Here are three more videos of DMLS Chamber testing.
The first two are long duration tests of the regen cooling:
This second long duration video is at a slightly higher O/F ratio, thus resulting in a lower flame temperature and reduced heating of the chamber walls.
In the last video, I was experimenting with camera settings trying to better capture the plume color and Mach diamonds. It didn't work too well. What did work well was the multiple starts/stops on chamber. Each stop/start is commanded remotely.
This second long duration video is at a slightly higher O/F ratio, thus resulting in a lower flame temperature and reduced heating of the chamber walls.
In the last video, I was experimenting with camera settings trying to better capture the plume color and Mach diamonds. It didn't work too well. What did work well was the multiple starts/stops on chamber. Each stop/start is commanded remotely.
Friday, February 17, 2012
Chamber Designs
I'm trying to decided what/if my next chamber will be. Should it be purely self-pressurized like the first one? Or should I pressurize the propane to get Pc and therefore Isp and thrust/weight up a bit? Should it be about the same thrust level as the first at 5 kgf? Or should I go for more like 10 kgf or even 20 kgf?
Here is a picture of my design for essentially the same specs as V1, just refined for improved cooling and manufacturing.

Here is a derivative of the above design for a chamber pressure of 200 psi and thrust of 20 kgf.
Here is a picture of my design for essentially the same specs as V1, just refined for improved cooling and manufacturing.

Here is a derivative of the above design for a chamber pressure of 200 psi and thrust of 20 kgf.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
DMLS Rocket "Group Buy"?
I'm finishing up design modifications to my DMLS printed chamber: http://www.rocketmoonlighting.com/projects/printed-chamber
I am planning to have the latest version printed sometime in the next few weeks - there are a few minor tweaks and improvements over the original which worked quite well.
There is a significant price reduction per unit when ordering more than one part, so if people are interested, it makes sense to buy more than one. Depending on the number of units, the price could be around half what it costs to make a single part. The price would be in the very low 4 digit range.
If you're interested, per the specs on the website above, drop me an email (i n f o at rocketmoonlighting.com). If I get a few responses, I'll do some homework and send out an email with more details to those who expressed interest.
I am planning to have the latest version printed sometime in the next few weeks - there are a few minor tweaks and improvements over the original which worked quite well.
There is a significant price reduction per unit when ordering more than one part, so if people are interested, it makes sense to buy more than one. Depending on the number of units, the price could be around half what it costs to make a single part. The price would be in the very low 4 digit range.
If you're interested, per the specs on the website above, drop me an email (i n f o at rocketmoonlighting.com). If I get a few responses, I'll do some homework and send out an email with more details to those who expressed interest.
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Update - Throttling the DMLS
Just a short note - I tested the DMLS chamber in the throttling configuration. All the previous tests were with on/off solenoid valves. Thrust level reached approximately 80% before the test was stopped when the stand started rolling.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



